Letters to the editor Reply

Research-agenda Bias: letters to the editor

Letters Letter to the Editor

The good name of TEX One of the many wonderful things about TEX is that its behaviour is essentially the same, no matter where it runs. TEX is a fixed point, identical on all machines. The same goes for METAFONT and the Computer Modern fonts. The author of TEX, Donald Knuth, has made it perfectly clear that he does not object to anyone revising TEX(or METAFONT) just as long as the resulting pro...

letter to the editor: author reply

dear editor:   we thank dr asadi amoli for her interest in our article. 1 dr asadi amoli pointed out that specific and sensitive rhabdomyosarcoma (rms) markers should be investigated in our case. 2 we agree with dr asadi amoli ’s opinion and are sorry that the results of pathology examination and myogenin (myf-4) staining studied in a local hospital were not provided in our case report.   an ex...

Letters Letters n Editor:

“Fronti Nulla Fides”: No reliance can be placed on appearance. In a letter to the editor (AI Mugazine, Winter 1989), Benjamin Kuipers criticizes various points made in an earlier paper of ours (Akman and ten Hagen 1989). First, a side (nonetheless important) remark: Although Kuipers asserts that he distributes QSIM to interested researchers, our experience has been otherwise. Akman has tried tw...

Reply to the Letter to the Editor Letter to the Editor Reply to Paraskevas

In reaction to ‘Prescribing statins in aortic stenosis: Little to lose, much to gain’ [1], we would like to provide the readership of this journal with some additional information concerning statin use — or underuse — in our study population. In our observational prospective cohort study, we described treatment strategies in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis in the Rotterdam area...